![]() 03/03/2016 at 07:40 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
!!! UNSUPPORTED LINE BREAK IN HEADER !!!
![]() 03/03/2016 at 07:51 |
|
During their wedding ceremony, my mother asked my father how she looked. He said she looked “ok”. That should have been a sign of things to come, as during her pregnancy he told her that she “looks like a beached whale”, and at their 25th anniversary dinner said “if I killed a man I would be out of prison by now”. I like to think she didn’t divorce him so that she can slowly extract her revenge, day after day, year after year.
![]() 03/03/2016 at 07:56 |
|
Kimi’s “OK” is everyone else’s “fantastic".
![]() 03/03/2016 at 08:10 |
|
“[The] first impression on the visibility test is positive,” Raikkonen said, through the FIA. “The structure does not hamper [visibility].”
Yeah... Kimi did not say that. “It’s okay” was probably about all that they got out of him,
![]() 03/03/2016 at 08:21 |
|
- Kimi. How was the visibility?
- OK
- Doesn’t it block too much of the vision?
-A little bit
- But doesn’t it bother the driving and your view of the track?
- Yes
- But you said it was okay
- It is OK
- How about the safety aspect. Do you think it will help?
- Yes
- Is the bother worth the increased safety?
- I don’t know
- If it was up to you. Do you think it is worth?
- Beh. I think it’s shit. But they told me to try it so I did.
![]() 03/03/2016 at 09:14 |
|
The story I read on Motorsport said they chose Kimi to do the test over Seb because Kimi would be more impartial about the visibility. I imagine they picked him because they knew they wouldn’t get a definitive yes or no either way.
![]() 03/03/2016 at 09:55 |
|
Seb’s trying it tomorrow.
![]() 03/03/2016 at 10:27 |
|
Okay